Basically the prompt doesn't encode a specific, detailed meaning. Plus there are inpainting techniques and whatnot. Someone who believes they have a good prompt, and are after a specific result may have to generate hundreds of images with that prompt to just get one good image which matches their intent. The prompt isn't all that important it sets a general thematic direction in that there will be identifiable elements in the result which are related to the prompt. You could blindly generate or select text for a prompt (meaning that you don't read the prompt and don't know what it is), feed it to Stable Diff, and obtain some images which invoke a meaning that you could allow to unfold without the interpretation being influenced by the prompt. The very dimensions of the image influence the content too, and some other parameters. Speaking of guessing about prompts, people are not always able to guess prompts a common question is "what prompt did you use?", especially from people who don't yet understand that you need the exact seed value and version of the model to reproduce that image. Nobody would guess they are from the same prompt. Under Stable Diff, the same prompt can generate countless images which are substantially, even completely different from each other. When encountering an art piece for the first time, we should give that meaning priority and only then receive "spoilers" the stories about the creation of the work which may be unrelated to how we experience the work. Mostly, the meaning of art depends on who is looking at it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |